"SILLICON WOMB " FOR BETTER EMBRYOS.

"SILICON WOMB " FOR BETTER EMBRYOS

LONDON: A team of UK researchers will soon be conducting trials of a "silicon womb" inserted into a woman's own womb which incubates embryos to provide a more naturalenvironment. The research team led by Simon Fishel, at UK fertility group CARE Fertility, in Nottingham, UK, hopes that this new device may produce better quality embryos and reduce the need to harvest so many eggs from infertile women. Usually, a standard In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) involves the eggs harvested from a woman to be fertilised in the lab where they are allowed to develop in an incubator for 2 to 5 days. Then the doctors pick up the healthiest embryos to be transferred into the uterus. But, the new device, developed by Swiss company Anecova, allows embryos created in the lab to be incubated inside a perforated silicon container inserted into a woman's own womb. After a few days, the doctors recover the capsule and select some embryos for implantation in the womb. The new device is a step ahead from the standard IVF that requires changing the growth medium of the embryos incubated in the lab, every few hours to provide new nutrients and get rid of waste, while the new device provides a more natural environment. The silicon capsule used measures about 5 millimetres in length and less than a millimetre in width having perforated walls with 360 holes, each around 40 microns across. When the embryos have been transfered inside, the ends of this tube are sealed and the container is connected to a flexible wire that holds the device inside the uterus. It has a thread that trails through the cervix for its recovery later on. A small trial on the device has already been conducted in Belgium and according to Fishel, the results were encouraging but not conclusive. CARE’s trial will be conducted on 40 women, each of whom will be having between 8 and 12 eggs harvested, then half their embryos incubated in the lab, and the other half inside the new device. "We will be able to directly compare the results of the in vitro and in vivo techniques," said Fishel. He also added that women will be made pregnant using only the healthiest embryos no matter which technique produced them. After 2 days, half of the devices used will be removed and the embryos will be tested for genetic defects. The rest will remain in place for 4 days, then it will be possible to assess the more mature embryos visually. According to Fishel, the new device could do away with some of the guesswork out of incubating embryos. "We don't really know the full ambient conditions of the reproductive tract. It is also a dynamic environment that changes constantly, and we can't replicate that," he said. He thought that embryos grown in the device will be more resilient, which implies that fewer eggs may need to be harvested from women to achieve a successful pregnancy. The majority of IVF techniques need the woman to stimulate egg production by taking hormones, which can sometimes lead to dangerous side-effects. However, he confessed that the Anecova capsule will not be placed exactly at the place where an early embryo would naturally develop, inside one of the fallopian tubes. An embryo normally spends around 7 days travelling down the tube towards the womb. "It's a lot closer to a fallopian tube than a plastic tray, but this new device is not an artificial fallopian tube. The trials will tell us whether the environment in the womb will do instead," said Laurence Shaw from the Bridge Centre fertility clinic in London and a spokesman for the British Fertility Society.
After reading the article, I thought what an amazing thing to do , a step further from IVF ,is it not amazing that the embryo will be placed in the capsule ,incubated and tested for genetic defects.My main concern is what the effects of the reasearch will have on the women being used .This is a newly tested techinque , I guess we all will have to wait and see how this advancement works out in the future.
This technique will further make it possible to have a higher probability of pregnancy with the capsule implant ,because it can be monitored and embryo growth can be confirmed ,vs the IVF , which in some cases the embryo does not form well after implant and another IVF is required. This silicon capsule insert is more like in vitro vs in vivo, which I think will be more cost efficent and less stressful on the woman who can go to the Doctor knowing that she has a higher probability of having the embryo form and grow to term. Verses the IVF which has a lower probability and once failed can cause severe emotional stress on the mother.

Reference:
Article from The Times Of India.